Carbon dating proven wrong

- At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Scientists dated dinosaur bones using the Carbon dating method.

The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead. They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again.

She said that some site that tries to prove Genesis, planted three trees together and waited until they were 5 years old.

Then they carbon dated them, and she said that the closet one said 5,000 years, and the other was 14,000 and then like 100 and something... She said that some site that tries to prove Genesis, planted three trees together and waited until they were 5 years old. Being "home schooled" is no excuse for not understanding the maths and physics and chemistry involved. It is well known that Carbon-14 dating is not possible on objects that have not existed from before the atomic testing in the 1940s.

In some cases, the latter ratio appears to be a much more accurate gauge of age than the customary method of carbon dating, the scientists said.

In principle, any material of plant or animal origin, including textiles, wood, bones and leather, can be dated by its content of carbon 14, a radioactive form of carbon in the environment that is incorporated by all living things.

So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion. So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts?

After all, this what the archeologist guessed in their published books.With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth.Note that, contrary to a popular misconception, carbon dating is not used to date rocks at millions of years old.Many people have been led to believe that radiometric dating methods have proved the earth to be billions of years old.This has caused many in the church to reevaluate the biblical creation account, specifically the meaning of the word “day” in Genesis 1.

Search for carbon dating proven wrong:

carbon dating proven wrong-20carbon dating proven wrong-45carbon dating proven wrong-56carbon dating proven wrong-53

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “carbon dating proven wrong”